William Brooks played a quiet but crucial role in a case that was anything but quiet. A former defense investigator in my federal prosecution, Fred Olivares had access, insight, and opportunity — yet never once sounded the alarm about what was unfolding around him.
The truth is, Fred Olivares wasn’t just an investigator. He was once an FBI agent — someone trained to spot red flags, false narratives, and constitutional violations. But during the government’s prosecution of me, he said nothing as the system leaned on false evidence and conflicted actors.
In a case riddled with Brady violations, suppressed evidence, and undisclosed relationships between government witnesses and prosecutors, William Brooks’ silence wasn’t neutrality. It was complicity. And when you trace his career history, you start to understand why.
This wasn’t just a failure to speak up. This was a pattern of passive validation. Brooks sat alongside Thomas McHugh and Fred Olivares — both of whom were wrapped in conflict, misconduct, or worse. He had a duty to report it. Instead, he sat quietly and collected a paycheck.
The keyword here is William Brooks VA fraud case. Because fraud isn’t always about money — sometimes it’s about silence. And silence, when you’re tasked with uncovering the truth, can be as damning as a lie.