The Department of Justice has perfected the art of silence in my case. With verified constitutional violations on the record — from Brady and Giglio breaches to a structural Sixth Amendment conflict — they’ve refused to file a single substantive response.
That silence isn’t protecting justice. It’s protecting the next wave of names that belong on the Brady list — the roster of government actors whose credibility is so compromised they can’t be trusted in court.
The Ghost in the Room: IRS-CI “Agent” Sean Scott
- No other public cases list him as an agent.
- No press releases, prosecutions, or paper trail — nothing like what you see for a career IRS-CI investigator.
- I first encountered him in 2011–2012 during a hearing — seated with Texas DPS officer Sharleigh Drake — years before the DOJ’s official start date for my case.
If “Sean Scott” is a pseudonym or cover identity, it’s not just unusual — it’s a constitutional problem:
- Brady/Giglio – The defense has the right to know the true identity and background of agents involved.
- Timeline Manipulation – Scott’s early presence contradicts the DOJ’s own version of when this case began.
The DOJ’s Wall of Silence
It’s not just Sean Scott. The Department of Justice is protecting a lineup of actors whose conduct destroys credibility and demands Brady listing:
- Gregory Surovics – Lead prosecutor who suborned perjury and has never been made to answer for the violations.
- Jamie and Fidel Esparza – DOJ leadership, fully aware of the record, doing nothing.
- Fred Olivares – “Former but not former” FBI agent embedded in my defense team, proven conflict of interest and cover-up.
- Wes Keeling – Already Brady listed, yet allowed to testify falsely about his role in the K9 handlers course.
- Jeffrey Breen (VA OIG) – Should be Brady listed. Testified before the grand jury that the case began when Bebe Glasgow contacted him — a statement Bebe Glasgow later testified under oath was false.
- Sharleigh Drake (Texas DPS) – Should be Brady listed. Backed Breen’s false origin story before the grand jury, contradicting Glasgow’s sworn testimony that she never contacted anyone.
> **Why False Grand Jury Testimony Matters:** > The grand jury is supposed to be the safeguard between the government and the accused — a body that only indicts when there’s probable cause based on truthful evidence. When federal agents give false testimony to a grand jury, they poison the process at its source. If the origin story of the case is a lie, then every action flowing from that indictment is built on a false foundation.
FOIA Confirmations They Can’t Erase
- Keeling was Brady listed as early as 2018.
- DOJ correspondence (2018) directly notified my defense counsel of Olivares’s conflict — a fact later denied in sworn affidavits.
- Communication chains between these actors were intentionally hidden from the defense.
Why This Matters Now
These are not old wounds. I remain under confinement. Every day the DOJ avoids a response is another day these constitutional violations go unaddressed.
My mandamus petition now before the Fifth Circuit asks them to:
- Vacate the district court’s blanket dismissal.
- Reopen all Rule 60(b) motions.
- Order the DOJ to finally respond — on the record.
If they grant it, the silence breaks — and these names could very well be on the next Brady list.
Read the central report: Brad Croft San Antonio — The Truth the DOJ Doesn’t Want You to Know